this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
1399 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59636 readers
3015 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the point. We want options for OSs to exist, instead of one company monopolizing the entire market.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Linux with 100% market share can’t monopolize the entire market because it doesn’t have a centralized distro

You see similar to Google with Redhat/Canonical. If everyone was with them then it would be a problem

[–] s_s@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Linux with 100% marketshare means nothing.

GPL is designed to protect developer rights, not user rights.

If google packaged your linux distro and sold it through the play store bundled with their own apps and sandboxed everything and called it chromeOS, your rights would not be any better protected.

Security and privacy involves users making informed choices to protect themselves, full stop.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

And as long as Chrome OS didn’t have majority market share it would be fine