this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
404 points (97.4% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3511 readers
200 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
404
What do you mean mechs are non-credible? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 year ago by PugJesus@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/noncredibledefense@lemmy.world
68 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nicman24@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

a space elevator for ~~nukes~~ payloads will probably come before mechs and that makes me sad

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A space elevator (on Earth) is pretty unfeasible. Mechs are much more likely.

[–] nicman24@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not really the alloys for the elevator will be the mech armor joints etc. You need something like that or you mech is just canon fodder