this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
173 points (88.1% liked)

Linux

48137 readers
428 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
173
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by IverCoder@lemm.ee to c/linux@lemmy.ml
 

Not that it's bad. For me, it's actually very useful, I just find it mildly amusing that an app for managing AppImages is packaged as a Flatpak, despite the two formats being widely known as competitors*.

* Okay, most people (including me) would say that the two formats are for different use cases and aren't directly competitors, but for the eyes of a lot of AppImage purists and Flatpak critics, they are.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tool for managing AppImages is distributed only as a flatpak.

[–] Mane25@feddit.uk 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean they are two things that co-exist, it's not like they're in commercial competition. Flatpak itself is usually distributed as an RPM or deb.

[–] 10EXP@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

OP is mostly joking about the appimage utility not having an appimage itself