Games

1622 readers

16 users here now

█▓▒░📀☭ g a m e s 💾⚧░▒▓█

Tag game recommendations with [rec]. Tag your critique or commentary threads with [discussion]. Both table-top and video game content is welcome! Original content or indie/DRM free material is encouraged!

Not a place for gamer gate talk or other reactionary behavior. TERFs and incels get the wall.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml

Makan@lemmygrad.ml

Starfield final impressions (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml to c/games@lemmygrad.ml

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

g*mer whining

I have given this game a fair chance. Maybe 8-10 hours of gameplay. But I can't go on. This game is really bad. It's just so dull. I feel like I'm at someone's wake. It's overly reliant on shooting but the shooting feels so bad. Especially laser weapons. The projectile look so weird.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] 0mod5@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Haven't played yet and definitely don't plan on purchasing it at full price but I had a hint that it might be over hyped when I saw someone post a negative review and everyone in the comments told him to "go back to playing CoD." Seems like a lot of people frothing over this game never played NMS and I can guarantee this game won't have nearly as much added free content as NMS either. I'm okay with admitting that I like a game just cause it's fun to look at and that's what Starfield seems like it is, but you're out of your mind if you think I'm paying $70 for that.

I think a lot of fans are trying to convince themselves that their favorite AAA game studios are still making bangers and they're not.