this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
811 points (98.2% liked)

Games

32666 readers
684 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

According to Hans-Kristian Arntzen, a prominent open-source developer working on Vkd3d, a DirectX 12 to Vulkan translation layer, Starfield is not interacting properly with graphics card drivers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stonedemoman@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

🀦 So you'll just continue to ignore overwhelming evidence and get defensive. It's ironic you'd call them special.

[–] avater@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

70 fps on average without any kind of wrong framepacing or stuttering is not "running like dogshit", thats my whole point, "mate". If the the game would run with 30 fps and crazy frame spikes on modern hardware I would agree but to call a >60fps stutterfree expierence that is just supid, on every game.

[–] stonedemoman@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you wouldn't call having your performance more than halved dogshit, I don't really give a fuck what you have to say.

[–] avater@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don’t really give a fuck what you have to say.

Feel free to not answer to my posts. Please. I'm more than fine never to hear from you again...

[–] Stahlreck@feddit.ch 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's kinda right though. You are partially too, the game doesn't run great but it runs fine. Definitely not dogshit. Hogwarts ran way worse for what it was with similar performance but also tons of stuttering on the best setups not to mention lots of crashing in multiple big AAA games this year. Starfield afaik has none of that, it just has lower than expected FPS but not terribly so.

[–] stonedemoman@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By the standard of being playable, I get that. But I'm not here to mince words. When you zoom out and look at the big picture, this one incorrectly used driver call turns a 3080ti into a 2060. A $1000 difference in performance. Defending Bethesda is just going to make future issues worse and worse.

[–] Stahlreck@feddit.ch -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess. I do have the luxury of having a 4090 and I've simply seen much smaller games with similar graphics run...similar if not much worse than this. Perhaps others have a different experience but besides the frames being lower than I would like I'm kinda glad such a huge game doesn't constantly crash for me or stutter every time is press the "sprint" button in a crowded area.

I do hope for improvement though

[–] stonedemoman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Other people in these comments have been reporting Starfield crashes, some of which "brick a character" apparently if it happens on an exit save (which you can't opt out of lol). Any sentiment of "it could be worse" just weakens our position as consumers IMO.