this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
421 points (98.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43971 readers
1931 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lemmy seems like the right place to ask this. Personally I've really enjoyed Gurgle, which is a FOSS Wordle clone app.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Jajcus@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Android is hardly open source these days.

[โ€“] puppy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

How come? Isn't that like saying Linux is not open source these days because RedHat keeps making their code more restrictive?

[โ€“] Ghoelian@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago

It would be like saying that if 99% of Linux users used RedHat.

AOSP is open source sure, but realistically basically everyone is using a closed source version that the OEM has messed with.

[โ€“] mateomaui@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, that's like saying RedHat isn't open source.

[โ€“] puppy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So that's like saying Google, Samsung is not open source. Not Android.

AOSP (Android Open Source Project) is separate from Google's. Similar to how RHEL and other related OSs are separate from Linux. Even though Google contributes to Android and Redhat contributes to Linux.

[โ€“] mateomaui@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

uhhhh.... I think? Android is built from linux, with a modified linux kernel, so linux can still be open source even when Android mostly isn't.

[โ€“] puppy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[โ€“] mateomaui@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ghoelian has already responded to you with what I essentially meant:

It would be like saying that if 99% of Linux users used RedHat.

AOSP is open source sure, but realistically basically everyone is using a closed source version that the OEM has messed with.

[โ€“] puppy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Same with Linux. I don't know of anyone who runs Linux from Scratch. Every Linux distro adds non-open code, be it audio drivers or codecs and the like.

[โ€“] shrugal@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There is no such thing as "hardly open source". Either the source is open or it isn't, and the source of Android definitely is. I think what you mean is "community driven", which is not the same thing. But open source always enables community driven forks and derivatives, which there are plenty of for Android.