this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
347 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

59329 readers
5062 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
347
US rejects AI copyright for famous state fair-winning Midjourney art (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 year ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world
142 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Controversial AI art piece from 2022 lacks human authorship required for registration.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skua@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a reason I said "they should be made to be more ethical" and not just "they should be more ethical". I know that they aren't going to do it themselves and I'll support well-written regulations on them.

but it doesn’t matter for this discussion.

Isn't it what almost your entire comment was about?

[–] Fisk400@feddit.nu 7 points 1 year ago

The argument was basically "that is how humans learn too". I accepted that analogy because it doesn't change my conclusion that AI can't be copyrighted. Had the discussion been about something else I wouldn't have accepted that argument.