this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
1068 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

60082 readers
3315 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
1068
Judge in US v. Google trial didn’t know if Firefox is a browser or search engine (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
182 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Judge in US v. Google trial didn’t know if Firefox is a browser or search engine::Google accused DOJ of aiming to force people to use “inferior” search products.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not "fatalistic", it's "fine" this way.

A judge doesn't have to know what mozilla is before a trial starts. Council can tell them what it is, how/whether it matters to the case, etc.

It's the lawyers that have the duty to inform the judge. You can't rely on every judge knowing everything about all topics. And they don't really need to..

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know what you're saying, and I understand it. But again, I'm not talking about how I perceive it, but how the other commenter described it ("we're doomed!") And like you, I thought it was an overreaction.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Ahh, gotcha.