this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
485 points (92.8% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3766 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Pennsylvania Democrat recalled his time serving as a Hillary Clinton surrogate in 2016, even after he supported Bernie Sanders in the primary.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rz2000@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This president made an empty promise about continuing to work for paid sick leave after preventing a strike by railworkers at the end of 2022. Except, that it actually worked. Almost every union did get paid sick leave for its members within six months aided by continued pressure from the White House.

He's a pretty lousy union buster.

[–] renownedballoonthief@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those paid sick days still count against the attendance records of the railroad employees via the actually insane "points" system, a system that the rail unions were fighting against. It's strange how all of the neoliberal papers that are sucking Biden off over this "win" neglect to mention that.

[–] jimbo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] renownedballoonthief@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Or you could see how the actual workers feel about it:

https://www.reddit.com/r/railroading/comments/166kdir/what_are_the_current_paid_sick_time_policies_for/

If you get investigated and disciplined for using your paid sick days, then you don't actually have paid sick days.

[–] jimbo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

TIL that a union is not "the actual workers". Amazing.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Its always fuckin ibew

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago

Controlled opposition.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Telling workers they can't fight for their own rights, and have to wait for politicians to do it for them us not progressive, and its not pro-labor. It's on a long list of swiftly festering bandages that only stave off death for a little while. If we don't empower our workers, we stifle them. Even if we bribe them candy when they demand steak.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

"You can't strike, but I will try to talk to your boss to get you some of what you desire" is still union busting. The union doesn't have the power anymore.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dont really blame you, theyve done quite the PR on this. There's an electrical worker union, with a branch dealing with railroad electricians. They supported the pre-strike deal the railroad companies offered, they likely already had things like sick leave. If youve seen reports on reactions of rail workers to the post-strike-busting situation, you very likely only saw quotes from this union. Of electrical workers.

[–] jimbo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's a dick move to downplay their big win. Here's another news release about a deal for sick days that affected eight unions: https://www.up.com/media/releases/paid-sick-leave-nr-230322.htm

[–] blazera@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is literally the rail company whose workers were prevented from striking

[–] jimbo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. Your point? Do you dispute that the listed unions got their sick days?

[–] blazera@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What they wanted? No i dont think they did.

[–] jimbo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You have a source that disputes that they got sick days?