this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
155 points (69.5% liked)

Privacy

32120 readers
626 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If I wanted to search for unverified info or misinfo, I could, but almost always I am lookkng for factual and sourced information. Please don't force me to do otherwise.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's more about someone else making the decision on what is "trustworthy" for you

[–] DigitalJacobin@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's how all search engines fundamentally work though. The whole point if that they try to bring the most relevant results to the top and downrank things like spam and unhelpful/irrelevant results. Downranking misinfo spam websites isn't "censorship". Not ranking resullts would make search engines completely pointless.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'd disagree with equating disinfo with spam. Spam seems easier to classify, sites that try to get ahead by having nonsense keywords or whatever and want to sell you something. Dis- or misinfo is trickier, you need to decide what is correct info. Do you understand what I mean?

[–] biddy@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Absolutely those things are different. But the point of a search engine is to, crudely and algorithmically, sort out both.