this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
133 points (99.3% liked)

Star Trek

10602 readers
28 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


New to Star Trek and wondering where to start?


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episodes, as well as previews for upcoming episodes. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
11-14 LD 5x05 "Starbase 80?!"
11-21 LD 5x06 "Of Gods and Angles"
11-28 LD 5x07 "Fully Dilated"
12-05 LD 5x08 "Upper Decks"
12-12 LD 5x09 "Fissue Quest"

Episode Discussion Archive


In Production

Strange New Worlds (2025)

Section 31 (2025-01-24)

Starfleet Academy (TBA)

In Development

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.


Allied Discord Server


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

LoglineCommander Una Chin-Riley faces court-martial along with possible imprisonment and dishonorable dismissal from Starfleet, and her defense is in the hands of a lawyer who’s also a childhood friend with whom she had a terrible falling out.


Written by Dana Horgan

Directed by Valerie Weiss

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pyrozo007@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is a bit tiring watching my space escapism but it's actually just highly contemporary societal issues, I know I shouldn't expect it not to be, because this series has been highly contemporary from the very first episode, but it's frustrating.

Almost everything about the show, from casting, effects, costumes, practical effects, vibe, directing, camerawork is all excellent.

The writing however is a straight 4/10. Not for the contemporary issues, though they contribute, but half the conversations in this series simply don't make sense. Has anyone else noticed this?

[–] Lockely@pawb.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Star Trek has always been contemporary issues wrapped in the veneer of space aliens. It's not meant to be pure escapism.

[–] Jon-H558@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I would say sci-fi probably has as well or story telling as a whole

Orsen Wells, Asimov etc. A lot of alagory

[–] Pyrozo007@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This was my first Star Trek Series, I've now realised it's a theme. It's certainly my least favourite aspect of the show.

The episode about child sweatshops in particular felt very accusational to me, the message seemed to be that by existing I'm causing child suffering akin to child murder, through cobalt mines and clothing sweatshops etc.

I'm reminded of that bit in The Good Place where the judge says "There's a chicken burger that, if you eat it, means you hate gay people. And it's so gooood! It's not fair!" (Referring to chik-fil-a)

[–] Lockely@pawb.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's more than a theme, it's the entire cloth the show is cut from. It's meant to be a vehicle for progressive, egalitarian, humanist ideals. It dares to see the world as a better place without the chains and vices of greed and capitalism and bigotry.

It's not popcorn sci-fi. It's a surprisingly deep show meant to make you confront biases and prejudices you may not have even realized you had.

[–] Pyrozo007@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes I get that, I simply find it doesn't achieve that goal and that its attempts to do so are without subtlety and overly contemporary, I'm now watching Discovery and in S01E03 or so, Captain Lorca cites Elon Musk as a great innovator.

The show is already dated and it's only 5 years old, that's a major downside.

I think it's primarily the shallow depth of the prejudice confrontation that causes the problem, I don't remember any episodes so far which didn't feel like primary school level metaphors for racism etc. A more tactful and/or deeper writer would perhaps cause me no issues

[–] Lockely@pawb.social 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The Elon comment kinda comes back around, you'll just need to keep watching and it'll make sense. Also, that image I used above was from a TOS episode about racism being stupid all the way back in the 60s. It's not trying to be subtle, and it never was.

And there's STILL people who think it's a show that glorifies and celebrates white, western colonialism and American exceptionalism. It has to be blatant because people miss the point regularly.

[–] theothersparrow@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It has to be blatant because people miss the point regularly.

Oh man, I've come to wonder that maybe subtext and subtlety could stand to be abandoned again, because the way people will miss or actively ignore the point...

[–] Pyrozo007@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It has to be blatant because people miss the point regularly.

I hadn't thought about that, it makes me think then about whether the stories could remain as blatant but have more depth. For example the court episode didn't have any story beyond 'Society (and Admiral April) is hypocritical and and racist' by demonstrating it through one person's story, and at the end of the story nothing has changed. I'm watching Discovery now and it's going for a similarly blatant racial and cultural purity is evil antagonist so far, but it feels like it's setting it up to be the antagonists' folly, which would be more of an interesting story.

[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Society (and Admiral April) is hypocritical and and racist’ by demonstrating it through one person’s story

That's just because it's a prequel, and this issue continues through DS9. So they can't change it. And that is the big weakness of much of current Trek being prequels.

[–] Pyrozo007@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just finished season 1 of Discovery and thought it was essentially flawless, though there was very little social commentary outside of Taran space nazis

Though it did deal with sexual assault and PTSD well, and other personal issues.

Season 1 of discovery was insane from start to finish, it was like when Game of Thrones was still good

[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm glad someone liked it. I guess you might be the third person I've met who liked any part of Discovery, and the first who thought it was anywhere close to flawless. No to be an ass - have you watched any Star Trek before these?

[–] Pyrozo007@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As I said somewhere else in this comment tree, Strange New Worlds was my first series.

I've now finished Discovery season 2, and holy moly they ruined that in a hurry. The writing quality difference between seasons 1 and 2 gave me whiplash, the middle of the season it got a bit better and then the ending did a game of thrones and retroactively made the rest of the season even worse.

So yeah, loved season 1 mainly because it was like a whole new series every 3 episodes, hated season 2 because it was 3 bad movies stretched across 14 episodes

[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Ahhh, yes Discovery probably was a lot more enjoyable if you've never seen any Star Trek before.

[–] mightyjoe@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're free to stop watching.

[–] Pyrozo007@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

You don't have criticisms for things you like? I like the show, this and the writing are really the only weaknesses it has in my view. Everything else in the list I gave about it is absolutely 10/10

[–] mightyjoe@startrek.website 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What you're saying is that you hate actually having to acknowledge that you consume stuff that causes pain and suffering and would rather just ignore it.

[–] Pyrozo007@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Correct. How do you propose I live in the modern world without a phone that uses cobalt?

There is a phrase that describes this situation: "There is no ethical consumption under capitalism"

There is nothing I can do while living in the modern world without benefitting from exploitation or encouraging evil, that's the point of the The Good Place quote I included.

I'm already depressed about it, I don't really want to be berated for it when there's nothing I can do about it. I already buy all my clothes second hand, fight my phone and laptop for basic privacy rights, vote for the least evil politician I can, I don't own a car.

[–] bulbasaur@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You can fight the system

[–] theothersparrow@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

Oof.

Really not trying to resort to "watch something else..." but the social commentary is pretty foundational to Trek.

I feel like The Mandalorian might be more your speed, the or maybe the Abrams reboot Trek.