this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
46 points (96.0% liked)

Programming

17432 readers
210 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] towerful@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the most_recent is to power the unique index constraint. This "powers" the whole thing.

Whereas the sort_order is to allow easy sorting, which is just for human readability. You could argue that you can rely on the "created_at" for this.
Considering the examples increment it by 10, I assume this is to allow admins to manually override a sequence or force a data consistency thing or whatever.

[–] ck_@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the most_recent is to power the unique index constraint. This "powers" the whole thing.

That much is clear, the question is: why is it needed at all? The sort key has the same uniqueness constraint, so there cannot be two entries with the same sort key value. So under which circumstances does the highest sort key value not reject the most_recent transaction?

[–] towerful@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I guess separation of concerns? One is for the system, one is for display?

A unique Boolean is easier to query than sorting and limiting?

Maybe you don't ever need the ability to display a history, but you still want the history (instead of just making the transaction_id unique constrained)... so you just drop the sort_order column?

I understand what you are saying.
Maybe that's just how they went about it. Originally planning on using created_at to do the ordering, then later realising that a customisable sort_order is required so they can make things make sense without having to fudge timestamps.