this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
230 points (97.5% liked)

Privacy

31886 readers
546 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

You just need to write it smaller than the Wi-Fi wavelength (~~about 60 nm~~) and you should be fine. If someone wants to read it, they have to use smaller wavelengths (i.e. higher frequencies), which means there’s a good chance that they will be blocked by your walls.

Edit: c/2.4 GHz ≈ 125 mm I took the first value from Wikipedia, without thinking about it enough.

[–] crapwittyname@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think your fag packet calculation has got a power of ten wrong somewhere. Wi-fi is GHz so that would be on the order of centimetres I think.

[–] Turun@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes. Wifi is 2.4 GHz, speed of light is 0.3 Gm/s. Therefore one wavelength is 0.3/2.4 m/s/Hz = 12.5 cm

[–] crapwittyname@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Or 0.001 football pitches

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, you’re right. Writing it smaller than 12.5 cm should do it, which is entirely reasonable.

[–] Wussy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What if I use an awesome font like Comic Sans and round the faces like party balloons? Still visible?

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

It’s all about the size. You can’t use an optical microscope to look at details smaller than the wavelength of visible light. You need an electron microscope for that. Similarly, a wifi camera can’t see details smaller that the wavelength.

If you made a camera that can see in 100 MHz radio waves, you could probably see mountains, rivers and houses, but anything smaller than 3 m would be nothing but blur.