100
Some real benchmarks on Bun (compared with Node) -- It only wins sometimes, but it's mostly a fail (www.youtube.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works to c/programming@programming.dev
24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Piped

Great watch but to summarize:

  • Bun beats Node/Yarn for package installation

  • Somewhat better API/DX in some ways.

  • Loses poorly in testing performance

  • Tons of incompatibility issues/performance issues in other areas.

General summary: Just don't use Bun yet, seems like it needs some more time in the oven.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tun@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Recently change node+npm+esbuild to bun runtime+package management+bundling and happy with the result.

The project is a static site built with middleman, tailwind, postcss and some frontend libraries.

It was simpler to work with for me. Node is way faster than ruby and so node speed was never an issue for me. But bun install is noticeably faster even for a small project.

this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
100 points (96.3% liked)

Programming

17351 readers
260 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
snowe@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz