this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
321 points (97.6% liked)

World News

39004 readers
3545 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Violates the right to your own image. You are not allowed to upload images of a classmate to an AI cloud without asking and neither to reach the generated images around.

[–] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is that an actual legal right? If you've described it accurately, then Facebook and Instagram would be completely illegal

[–] rentar42@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

It depends on your location, different countries have very different laws.

For example in most countries it's perfectly acceptable to have someone in a picture that you're taking in public (for example you're taking a picture of a building and someone happens to walk by). A notable exception to this is France, where apparently the right to ones own image is quite strong which technically makes most pictures of the Eiffel Tower illegal (as long as any one person is identifiable on it).

Taking (and distributing) a picture specifically of a specific person that's just doing random stuff in public is already less uniform and varies. There's often some protection to basically say "no, you can't make fun of some random person for having the wrong tshirt, they have a right to privacy". A notable exception to that is usually "public figures" (which mostly means people in political, religious or commercial leadership positions): they mostly just have to accept to be pictured wherever.

Protection for pictures taken in a private is usually the strongest (so yes, if you post a picture of your 3 best friends at a small party in your home, you might have to ask them for permission!)

How all of this applies to pictures that "aren't real" but look disturbingly so is probably going to be fought over in court for a good while.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, human right. And yeah, they mostly are. But it's not Facebook offending but each of the teens, so nobody can really enforce it. Same like with phone numbers, except that those are actually protected by law in most countries.

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

~~AI generates novel images, though. They are merely trained to produce your likeness. None of the pixels are from any source images.~~

In this case, I'm mistaken. They used a clothing remover app on normal photos and did not train an AI.

[–] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Jesus Christ that’s not even close to AI they literally stitched together shit like photoshop

By the way, where do you see that clothoff ( the app mentioned in the article) doesn’t use trained AI models? I’m refraining from visiting their site to check myself as I don’t really want to give them that traffic and I figured I’d ask you direct instead as you already went their to verify I assume)

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't say the app doesn't use trained models. I said the students didn't themselves train an embedding or LORA against the other students' faces in order to generate entirely new pics.

Ah, good point I missed that detail. Thanks for clarifying