this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
442 points (90.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43958 readers
1071 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A few examples include s*x questions on askreddit, "this" comments, nolife powermods, jokes being more frequent than actual answers

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It’s going to be a challenge for them to reach new people to warp to their worldview if they are largely kept away from everyone else.

This only makes sense if you assume that new people would be funneled into extremist Lemmy instances from other Lemmy instances, but it's far more likely that new people will be pointed toward such communities through other paths, and then they won't be exposed to competing ideas.

Don't misunderstand me - I'm not saying that hate speech, racism and sexism should be ignored or allowed to exist alongside other content on Lemmy. I am saying that trying to ignore that, separate ourselves from it, and pretend like it doesn't exist and doesn't affect us, is ultimately counterproductive.

[–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they won’t be exposed to competing ideas

They wouldn't be exposed to competing ideas if nobody defederates. They would subscribe to their own communities, where normal people would not participate, leaving only toxic ineffectual discussion.

Defederating is not ignoring the problem. It's an active choice. It's scooping the floaters out of the pool. It's a clear message that bigotry is not tolerated. When they get bored of their hateful shit they can come and have manners and enjoy cat pictures with the rest of us.

I will decline being the counterpoint for this bullshit. It's not a normal person's responsibility to educate bigots.

[–] spauldo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

One nice benefit of this method is that people who spend too much time in echo chambers eventually start sounding like raving lunatics, which hurts their credibility in the real world.