this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
1001 points (95.7% liked)
Technology
59609 readers
3831 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Why would anyone think Bluesky is any better than Twitter? There are no fundamental differences.
It's not owned by Musk, which is what the average casual internet user is currently upset about with Twitter.
I mean, if ~~Twitter~~ X keeps changing like it is, there will be a whole bunch of differences
From a feature-functional perspective, sure, but it's not entirely true. The biggest differentiators for social media are rarely the core features, but the content and friends. There's a few specific groups that have slowly been migrating from Twitter and Mastodon there.
There's a couple of very famous people that have moved over and because the audience is smaller, they tend to engage with people more often.
You are right. In principle, the AT protocol is designed for federation. But at the moment, there is only one Bluesky instance that everyone is signing up on. This makes it effectively centralized like Twitter. It is mind-boggling that people are ignoring Mastodon for this.
Less fascists for one