this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
489 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59296 readers
4282 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

An investigation by Wired reveals the grisly complications of Neuralink brain implants in monkeys, including brain swelling and paralysis.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] squiblet@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He's testing it on paralyzed people, so they're probably depressed and desperate. It's kind of like he's trying to help, but it could be seen as sleazy because he knows these people will try anything to fix their situation.

[–] DeveloperKai@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"He's testing it on paralyzed people"

He's exploiting paralyzed people under the guise of trying to help them.

[–] jhulten@infosec.pub 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hes experimenting on the disabled.

[–] thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I mean, at some point a treatment for the disabled has to be tested on the disabled.

There's a lot wrong with Musk, but testing a medical device on the target patients is hardly unethical.

[–] keefshape@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

It is at the current stage. That is the point.

[–] Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When some stupid high percentage of animal test subjects die from the test, you would think they'd work on the product more before moving forward. Instead they're like "welp caused paralysis and death in the majority of our animal test patients, this is totally ready for human tests!"

I'm not saying their methods aren't flawed, just that testing a medical device on the targeted users is not at all unethical and is a requirement for approval.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Sure, that's what I was saying in the following sentence.

[–] Clevermistakes@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

So to phrase this appropriately: you could say the apartheid blood emerald trust fund baby is experimenting with dangerous technology on disabled people because he views them as less than human. I don’t think it can be viewed any other way than sleazy. Besides it’s not like people with disabilities are so desperate they don’t care about their quality of life.