this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
2056 points (96.1% liked)

Memes

45623 readers
1161 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It wouldn't be any dangerous if car and bike infrastructure was structurally separated (and if there were far fewer cars).

[–] Kolrami@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That should be changed, shouldn't it?

[–] Kolrami@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course, but if my vehicle was the only vehicle in the world, I'd still feel like a 2 year old kid on the back of my bike going 7 miles is more dangerous than on a bus, train, or even a car over the same distance.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair enough, a seat on the back is the least safe option to transport kids.

There are options like this though. Seatbelts, low position, side walls.

[–] Kolrami@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I don't mind this too much, but I'd want more padding for the kid and an extra wheel in the back for stability.