politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I think USA is primarily a good force on this planet, and the fact that resolutions like this are possible emphasizes that somewhat. If it passes, even better, although that's probably way too optimistic.
It's very hard to agree with your first sentence if the second is so hard to become a reality.
Secondarily we're a force for evil, so that tracks.
It's easy when you realize that the real world is not comicbook -style good and evil. It's a spectrum.
You don't read a lot of comic books either, do you?
To finance a military coup and regime in a foreign country, committing or helping to commit magnicide while denying it to your citizens and the world in the name of democracy, is evil. After 50 years, apologizing for it is not absolutely "good", I'd say it's the absolute least you can do about it, after the fact. Seriously, you can do so much better.
Perhaps I wasn't clear. It's a spectrum, and it's relative. We can talk about optimal situation and utopias (sure, I'd love it if none of them were evil at all), but in the real world the big actors are evil countries and more evil countries. Unfortunately we don't have a view into everything they've done, so we have to go by the little we know, and by the gut. My knowledge + gut says that USA is among the less evil countries. Yours seem to say differently.
In what way is the USA a force for good? This isn't the only coup that they have orchestrated, they have not only continued to do so since and will likely perform more in the future.
This is not to mention the other countless atrocities committed under its flag.
Too bad this apology decades after the fact won't undo what happened and won't prevent the US from carrying out actions like this in the present and the future. It's better than nothing, but in the context of the actual global policies of the US, it's fluff. The US has always been good with PR, so I'm not surprised that you think this empty gesture is meaningful in any way.
Contrast the op with say, an apology by China for the tienamen square massacre. Oh wait...
Again, an apology without correcting behavior is meaningless. What's the point of this apology if the US is still invading and couping countries on the regular? I'd rather no apology and just stopping that.
China and tankies outright deny that it even happened, really. You can see it even here, in some lemmygrad comments. So apologizing for it would be a fine first step since it would acknowledge it.