this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
481 points (94.5% liked)
Technology
59161 readers
1813 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The problem is that Alexa isn't actually parsing the meaning of the total phrase, she's taking each individual word as it comes. With that context, she would just as easily interpret your phrasing as "thing with thing on the side". You'd still get chive crackers, honey crackers, peanut butter, and cream cheese.
Edit: I thought about this a bit more, and it seems to me the only way Alexa could actually understand what you wanted is if you said "chive cream cheese crackers" or "peanut butter honey crackers". You have to implicitly make it one item and not a potential combination of multiple items.
Yeah I had the same realization as I was reading this:
you can not add Boolean terms and expect it to not separate it.
So run on nonsense sentences are your friend and will definitely make the training from you so much more useful.