this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
42 points (80.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9604 readers
785 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hate how the BBC always use passive voice for car crashes. No mention that a driver is at fault.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

it could have been a mechanical failure

So the owner (who is probably the driver)'s fault.

a panicky swerve to avoid a dog running into the road, etc.

So the driver's fault.

Without knowing more they report passively, which I feel is appropriate.

But yes, this remains correct even if the driver is at fault, someone must assign that fault, and that's not BBC's job. Could passive voice the driver in there too though.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

On the note of mechanical faults, it is odd that cars are typically safetied when sold/transfered to a new owner and never really required to be inspected again. Regular safety inspections should be a mandatory part of car ownership.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

We had them when I was a kid in Virginia. My shitty Corolla failed because the driver-side door handle didn't work on the inside.

They wanted $150 to fix it, so I just tied a rope to the mechanism inside the door. It passed.

All-told, it's a great idea and also provides some business for local mechanics.

[–] cowpowered@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Mandatory periodic (typically annual/biannual) safety inspections are fairly common: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle_inspection

It is in the UK. You have to get an annual MOT check, I believe. I've also found it odd that that isn't required where I am either, though.

[–] echo@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] olicvb@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

oh hey everyone! Look at the beautifully crafted reply. Isn't that just great how this person adds to the conversation in a meaningful way?