this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
139 points (91.6% liked)

Lemmy.world Support

3216 readers
2 users here now

Lemmy.world Support

Welcome to the official Lemmy.world Support community! Post your issues or questions about Lemmy.world here.

This community is for issues related to the Lemmy World instance only. For Lemmy software requests or bug reports, please go to the Lemmy github page.

This community is subject to the rules defined here for lemmy.world.

To open a support ticket Static Badge


You can also DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport or email report@lemmy.world (PGP Supported) if you need to reach our directly to the admin team.


Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages 🔥

https://status.lemmy.world



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I have been uploading comic art images by Moebius for several weeks almost daily to the !eurographicnovels@lemm.ee community, where I´m a moderator myself. All those images have disappeared. Modlog says the images have been deleted by "admin". Modlog gives no reason for this but says the images were later restored by "admin" but that is not true. All my comic art posts have been destroyed and are empty posts now. I was not even contacted a single time about this and honestly can´t think of a reason because I had uploaded exclusively "safe for work" and apolitical material. We are trying to build a community for european graphic novels like "Tintin", "Lucky Luke" and "The Incal" and I put a lot of love in those posts because I want to help make our community interesting and grow. However - I have been stongly discouraged to contribute content now that I have seen it gets arbitrarily wiped by anonymus admins. How can I find out what happened, who deleted my stuff and why they did so? How can I avoid this happeing to my posts in the future?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Teppic@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't really have issue with a bot rate limiting, or suspending users (provided the false positive rate is low enough), but there does need to be a robust appeal and undo process which is the bit which seems to be lacking here.

[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's always the dilemma. The higher the ratio of banning bots, the higher rate of false positives. Do you want more bots with virtually no users being banned or do you want virtually no bots with a lot of legitiment users being unfairly banned?

The answer most sane people take is the former but not everyone shares that opinion.

[–] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Using scripts to flag possible bots/spammers is fine. The final decision should be made by a human though. I would volunteer for that.

[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure but you'd need enough volunteers to sort through hundreds or even thousands of flags daily. Not always possible with large userbases but having a 'likely false positive' subset that can be done by manual review would be good.

You shouldn't have lost your contributions and it's made worse by an ineffective restoration feature.

[–] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

You shouldn’t have lost your contributions and it’s made worse by an ineffective restoration feature.

Yes, indeed!