Technology

37712 readers

173 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

Los@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

So Much for ‘Learn to Code’ (web.archive.org)

submitted 1 year ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/technology@beehaw.org

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Atlantic Paywall link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AbstractifyBot@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (9 children)

TL;DR for the linked article

The article discusses how the rise of AI may impact computer science careers going forward. While coding jobs have long been seen as stable career paths, chatbots can now generate code in various languages. Developers are using AI tools like Copilot to accelerate routine coding tasks. Within a decade, coding bots may be able to do much more than basic tasks. However, programmers will still be needed to guide AI toward productive solutions. Teaching coding is also becoming more challenging, as students could use chatbots to cheat. Conceptual problem-solving skills will remain important for programmers to apply their expertise where AI falls short. The future may belong to those who can think entrepreneurially about how technology solves problems.

In the end, what students study may matter less than their ability to apply knowledge to technology challenges.

This comment was generated by a bot. Send comments and complaints via private message.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (8 children)

However, programmers will still be needed to guide AI toward productive solutions

So it would still be safe, they'd just be doing different work from what they do now. Same as how other advances in tech stacks made it so we do things differently now than 30 years ago.

People are very adaptable

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Indeed. Do people still use emacs to code, for example?

Technologies evolve. People coding today in COBOL or Fortran are few and far between (but very well compensated).

[–] Nyoelle@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Hell yea we do use emacs!

load more comments (5 replies)

load more comments (6 replies)