this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
228 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59296 readers
4402 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Some drivers at DoorDash and Grubhub supported the New York City pay bump, but others say it will actually mean less pay and freedom.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But wages and benefits have no actual dependency on scheduling

This is only loosely true. If companies must pay a stable hourly wage, then they're going to want stable continuous labor for that. As of now, drivers are paid for each job, which creates a lot of flexibility for both parties. If that becomes illegal, Uber Eats etc. isn't going to want to pay people to sit around in between jobs. It also allows them to explicity direct a driver to do a certain job rather than offer a job to a driver.

It's fundamentally a pretty different dynamic. Some people might find it preferable, others won't. There's some nuance here

[–] fiat_lux@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't consider what a company wants to be a true dependency. It's a strong and valid desire to prevent unnecessary financial loss, but it's not a requirement with only one possible solution.

If gig SaaS companies are innovative enough to come up with a way to allow remote commitment flexibility in the first place, they're creative enough to come up with ways of preventing drivers abusing that system without scheduling them in fixed time blocks in this day and age. Threatening a schedule is just the easy way out and a scary enough threat to drivers to get them to side with DoorDash.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I guess ultimately, it's a question of why they would bother to put in time, effort, and money into developing procedures that offer them no real benefit.

Ideally, I'd rather see the development of a formalized gig worker legal status, but that would require the government to be capable of thought.