281
submitted 11 months ago by voxel@infosec.exchange to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml -3 points 11 months ago

not necessarily. you need security for privacy but you don't need privacy to be secure.

your data is more secure on windows from malicious 3rd party actors than Linux, but you have lower privacy due to Microsoft's ridiculously invasive telemetry. The telemetry does not decrease your security though.

[-] muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I wouldn't agree the telemetry essentially increases ur attack surface to include all of Microsoft. Sure a Microsoft server might be more secure than something else but they are also a far bigger target

this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
281 points (99.3% liked)

Privacy

31279 readers
566 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS