this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
49 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59223 readers
3221 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cordoro@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wasn’t the face scan a part of the original announcement? And appointments make sense at first the same way the early Apple Watch purchases required an appointment to make sure the bad was fit right and stuff.

Honestly, getting the fit on head right is probably super important to this product experience, and they won’t want to risk it.

[–] RemembertheApollo@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hm. We have 2 kinds of HMD in our household. “Fit” is not problematic, but it’s profitable marketing.

[–] Cordoro@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Having worked on HMD optical designs, lenses can be designed to tolerate a wide variation of users with some degradation that isn’t too bad, but if you want to maximize stuff like field of view and brightness and other things, you can end up with a tiny spot that the eyes need to be in. If they’ve decided to do a more optimized lens design, they might have more strict eye box requirements.