this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
170 points (100.0% liked)
196
18049 readers
579 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
keeping most pokemon would be a nightmare tbh
You know... I never thought about that. I would usually wonder why trainers only have like 2 or 3 pokemon.
I only have 2 dogs despite there likely being 150 breeds. What kind of psycho would horde so many pokemon?
Imagine a charmander and evolutions. Constant fire hazard from the tail alone. That little fuck would spend it's entire life in it's pokeball if I want to have any hope of insurance covering my house.
Actually I feel like insurance just wouldn't cover you if you have any pokemon at all unless you pay extremely high premiums.
Also that's not even mentioning all the world damage adventuring with something like a fire pokemon would be, starting fires everywhere. I'm sure electric pokemon cause huge issues with the power grid with spikes. Sounds like an absolute nightmare to work in infrastructure.