this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
170 points (100.0% liked)

196

18049 readers
1158 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sentinian@lemmy.one 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Next time someone asks me how I am I will just send a poorly cropped screenshot of that cat cause it sums it up perfectly

[–] asbestos@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago
[–] Duchess@yiffit.net 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

keeping most pokemon would be a nightmare tbh

[–] ironic_elk@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You know... I never thought about that. I would usually wonder why trainers only have like 2 or 3 pokemon.

I only have 2 dogs despite there likely being 150 breeds. What kind of psycho would horde so many pokemon?

Imagine a charmander and evolutions. Constant fire hazard from the tail alone. That little fuck would spend it's entire life in it's pokeball if I want to have any hope of insurance covering my house.

Actually I feel like insurance just wouldn't cover you if you have any pokemon at all unless you pay extremely high premiums.

[–] pancakes@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

Also that's not even mentioning all the world damage adventuring with something like a fire pokemon would be, starting fires everywhere. I'm sure electric pokemon cause huge issues with the power grid with spikes. Sounds like an absolute nightmare to work in infrastructure.

load more comments
view more: next ›