this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
721 points (95.2% liked)

linuxmemes

21260 readers
850 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    721
    i find it's a great tool. (lemmy.world)
    submitted 1 year ago by SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    181 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Sysosmaster@infosec.pub 9 points 1 year ago

    Pulseaudio was also replaced relatively quickly by pipewire. lets check that, shall we:

    PipeWire: Initial release 20 June 2017; 6 years ago source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PipeWire

    PulseAudio: Initial release 17 July 2004; 19 years ago source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PulseAudio

    so "relatively quickly" is a time span of 13 years in your idea.... or the difference between 2004 and 2017.

    if that's your level of detail... your whole "rant" is worthless...

    But lets be generous and look into it,

    init scripts were so simple they could be understood just by looking at the name

    this is blatantly false, for the old system you need to know about runlevels, what they mean, how the half backed init annotations work, and its dependency check works.

    ### BEGIN INIT INFO
# Provides:          myrec
# Required-Start:    $all
# Required-Stop:
# Default-Start:     2 3 4 5
# Default-Stop:
# Short-Description: your description here
### END INIT INFO

    you needed special tools to watch if an application actually was running and not crashed, and to keep it running.

    add to that that the difference between systemd.service file and a sysv / init / initd script is more or less the same complexity (just different standards).

    the universal format for log files was plain text false, the universal format for logging was plain text..

    which is currently (slowly) getting replaced with structured logging. (which is objectively better, imho). there are a number of different log formats, most use a binary (compressed) format. logging to plain text was generally only used for the most recent log entries. a binary format for logging, as long as there's is tooling to get it to a (structured) textual output, is better than a pure text log. I mean, if its good enough for MySQL / MariaDB it ought to be good enough for you....