this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
905 points (97.1% liked)

World News

32288 readers
550 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Zippy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry was not you. Point being stands though. Your source does not help his post but negates it.

[โ€“] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

From the source of link 3:

Figure 17 Primary Reasons for Leaving Last Housing, All Participants

  • Lost or reduced income: 12%
  • Conflict among residents: 9%
  • Didn't want to impose/wanted own space: 7%
  • Conflict with property owner: 7%
  • Someone else became sick, disabled, or died: 6%
  • Building was sold or foreclosed: 6%
  • Violence or abuse in the household: 5%
  • Breakup between residents: 4%
  • Participant's substance use: 4%
  • Other needed more space: 4%

and also:

To understand what participants believed may have prevented their homelessness, we asked them to engage in a thought experiment about the likelihood that their homelessness could have been prevented had they received financial intervention. We provided all participants with three different scenarios and asked them whether each intervention would have prevented their becoming homeless for at least two years.29 The interventions were: (1) a monthly rental subsidy worth $300-$500; (2) a one-time payment of $5,000 to $10,000; or, (3) a voucher that limits rent contribution to 30% of their income (such as a Housing Choice Voucher).

FIGURE 21 Participant Report of Effect of Hypothetical Homelessness Prevention Interventions by Family Structure

All

  • $300-$500/month shallow subsidy: 70%
  • $5,000-$10,000 one-time payment: 82%
  • Housing voucher: 90%

So while "not enough money" might not have been the most common cause for people being homeless, the vast majority of people think having more money or cheaper housing would have prevented them from becoming homeless.