38
Anyone hosting Lemmy and Mastodon on the same server?
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
38 points (93.2% liked)
Selfhosted
39964 readers
190 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
This is what containers were made for my friend. I'm sure that both Lemmy and Mastodon have Docker images available. If not you can always run your installs in LXC containers instead.
I just got it working. I used a Docker install for Lemmy but not for Mastodon and setup reverse proxy manually. I still have some fine tuning to do, but it works! Woot!
I would personally recommend putting them both in Docker containers, but I'm glad it's working for you.
Thanks for the suggestion. What would be the benefit of switching to a docker install of Mastodon?
Basically the whole point of docker is that it keeps all the fiddly junk involved in actually running an application separated off into its own little box where it can't affect the host system. So by taking one of those applications and putting it directly on the host system you're sort of undoing all that.
The idea is that the docker host basically shouldn't do anything other than run docker itself. That way there's minimal chance of anything getting screwy. Also using docker installs for all your critical apps means that you can use Watchtower to auto update them, which is a nice bonus.
Thanks for the perspective! I am a reluctant newcomer to Docker so I appreciate it. Time for me to get with the times and embrace Docker since that's the most popular installation method for many of my favorite self hosted platforms these days. It might take a while for me to really get used to it though. Since I have this setup and working it will probably remain as is, but I'll make a point to do a pure Docker setup on a similar build in the future.