413
bugs
(discuss.tchncs.de)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
413 points (97.5% liked)
Programmer Humor
32380 readers
799 users here now
Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)
Rules:
- Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
- No NSFW content.
- Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
It looks like it's decompiled from something, so all the variable names are missing and instead presented with whatever index they had in the binary.
But that's just a wild guess. I don't know what actual decompiled code looks like.
Edit: scratch that, it's just obfuscated code to make it harder to copy.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11932567/found-this-nasty-code-i-wonder-what-it-does-should-i-be-worried#11932708
I thought it was decompiled code at first to, but the function names are still real words. It's almost like it was manually obfuscated by replacing all the variable names.
Found it. It's just obfuscated to make it harder to copy.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11932567/found-this-nasty-code-i-wonder-what-it-does-should-i-be-worried#11932708
I don’t think you’re far off because obfuscated code usually has less structured variable references.