this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
210 points (96.9% liked)

Selfhosted

40330 readers
424 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

v.0.0.6

v0.0.4 - Per requests and concerns: Defaults changed and options added to prevent overloading servers, hitting rate-limiting, filtering to top x communities, etc!

Thanks for your support!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The script gets all of the publicly federated communities and "makes them known" to your local instance and then subscribes to them. "All" should be populated with activity from around the Lemmyverse.

Doesn't that significantly increase the load on your instance and, if many instances use it, all instances? This system isn't designed with the idea that each instance receives everything from every other instance.

It might be better to run this on a single dedicated site which people can come to to browse. If you could learn where each user had their account, you could send their upvotes, downvotes and comments to that instance.

[–] hawkwind@lemmy.management -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It increases load during execution. Afterward it’s not significant. My instance is heavily instrumented and monitored. The load this incurs subscribing to 24000 communities is less than adding a single, moderately active user to your instance.

It’s a huge miss if the intended design was to silo information.

What this provides, as far as I’m concerned, is essential to prevent centralization to a few instances.

Is there a better way to do it inherently in Lemmy itself? Probably, and I am excited to help with that!

[–] wintermute@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

It is a significant difference if an instance has to federate literally every post made on the lemmyverse.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well that sounds quite reasonable then. It definitely answers a need for better discoverability of material on Lemmy. And it would be great if something like this could ultimately be integrated into Lemmy itself.

[–] hawkwind@lemmy.management 2 points 1 year ago

I think your idea is on the right track when thinking longer term and assuming the worst case in both design and admin behavior. :)

The whole network needs to be split into "active" and "archive." New activity (or at the very least stubs to where new activity is happening) needs to be updated regardless of where it occurs without having to capture anything extra.