this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
649 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59223 readers
3341 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
649
YouTube TV, which costs $73 a month, agrees to end “$600 less than cable” ads (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
135 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

YouTube TV, which costs $73 a month, agrees to end “$600 less than cable” ads::Google to "modify or cease" ads after industry review board rejects appeal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nocturne213@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dropped around the same time. I really only had it for local channels, but the stuff I was watching ended up on other streaming apps day or two later anyway.

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

It was a great delivery mechanism for live sports for me. I went back to sling and put up a TV antenna. Too bad none of my local channels come in great past 15 miles, but I'd be a fool to pay that premium for locals.