this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
127 points (94.4% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2411 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

She’s probably being asked since most Palestinian Americans ive seen posting online aren’t even addressing whether or not they support Hamas

Whether you support Hamas is a more complicated question than whether you support Netenyahu, because while they're horrible they're also basically the only ones who are fighting against Israeli oppression (the West Bank government has been well and truly irrelevant since 2007), so "I support Hamas" and "I don't support Hamas" are both wrong answers. Personally I believe they're a necessary evil, though some of their actions (see: The excessive civilian casualties during last week's attack) deserve unequivocal condemnation.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wouldn't say they're a necessary evil. More like they're the last ones left after all the alternatives got killed/bulldozed.

[–] Unaware7013@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

(They were also supported by Israel to weaken and delegitimize other Palestinian political factions)

[–] player1@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s a complicated history. Originally they were more of a charitable organization and gradually morphed into their current state. But I understand why you left that out since it wasn’t convenient for this line of reasoning/victim blaming

[–] Unaware7013@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hol up, is your argument is that Hamas was a charitable organization in 2019 when they were funding them to delegitimize the Palestinian Authority with the express purpose of sabotaging the Palestinian state?

Because if so, that's a big fucking yikes bruh.

[–] player1@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Unaware7013@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cool story, but what does that have to do with Israel funding them in 2010s?

I get the point you're trying to make, but I'm honestly not sure how it relates to mine. The fact they used to be a charitable organization is immaterial to Israel funding Hamas well after they became militant against Israel, and them doing it for the purpose of helping delegitimize the PA and sabotage Palestine as a state.

[–] player1@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You’re shifting the discussion. This thread started with OP saying Hamas is a necessary evil 8 days after they slaughtered 1300+ civilians in cold blood and abducted 100+ more.

[–] Unaware7013@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're shifting the discussion

L. O. L. What happened to the cOmPlIcAtEd HiStOrY argument you were just making while failing to refute the point that Israel supported/funded Hamas?

This thread started with OP saying Hamas is a necessary evil 8 days after they slaughtered 1300+ civilians in cold blood and abducted 100+ more.

Is that what they said? Because you're leaving out the very important end of the comment that I was specifically replying to:

More like they’re the last ones left after all the alternatives got killed/bulldozed.

And you want to accuse me of shifting the discussion?! You need to get over yourself and realize that Israel's very recent funding is absolutely and directly material to the discussion at hand.

[–] player1@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh ok so you support the intentional targeting and killing of innocents since you think Hamas is a necessary evil. Thanks for clearing that up

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bro I get you're trying to be obnoxious here but the word "necessary evil" includes "evil".

[–] player1@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I’m the obnoxious one? Palestinians have plenty of other options - they could’ve voted for a party other than Hamas and instead that was the political ideology they felt would best represent them. Well when you elect terrorists and they commit heinous acts, that government can’t be allowed to continue to govern.

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] player1@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it means that the usa does terrorism as a matter of policy, and the pentagon will never let you dismantle their government.

[–] player1@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah ok so please tell me which middle eastern country is morally superior to the U.S.

I’ll wait.

baby, I'm an anarchist: smash capital and the state.