928
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Jerkface@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I feel like there might be interesting ways to deal with it. Perhaps the mass killing of neutrals only ever happened the first time, which could have been many generations ago and under singular circumstances. Since then, only the odd one here or there ever dies during the purge. Perhaps it's been decades or centuries since anyone died to the purge, reinforcing belief in it's effectiveness as a basis for a pure society. It may have been so long that people wonder whether the purge is even real, or just a traditional ceremony carried out annually based on old myths. Then one year, it wipes out half the city. The party investigates?

[-] Godnroc@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

The ritual could have been real, but was quietly faked so that a corrupt leader could avoid facing their fate.

Or, the ritual was always fake but used as a cover to assassinate specific targets without consequences.

[-] Jerkface@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Yes! And the ambiguity means the DM doesn't have to decide which it is until the players have deduced certain facts.

[-] 50gp@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago

whoever is casting that spell into a crowd of peasants will definitely turn evil

[-] wahming@monyet.cc 7 points 11 months ago

Followed by 3 quarters of the party dying to the ritual, most likely.

[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

If they're high enough level relative to the caster the spell doesn't do insta-death, it just hurts a bit.

Otherwise the clerics would probably nuke themselves the first time they tried this. Maybe. The ethics of this spell are confusing.

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
928 points (98.7% liked)

RPGMemes

10146 readers
135 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS