this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
234 points (100.0% liked)

196

17958 readers
557 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (15 children)

I personally find this confusing. The sign reads “Left turn yield on green”, which implies that you yield when the arrow is lit. A sign that says “right lane stop on red” means stop when the light is red, not when it isn’t.

[–] boothin@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (14 children)

You're ignoring the giant green circle on the sign, which means you yield on green solid, not green arrow. Green arrows give you right of way. If you're in the US and drive, please learn the road signs

[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Not arguing about what the actual traffic laws are. I am arguing that this is objectively confusing design. "Left turn yield on green (CIRCLE)" does not mean that left turn yields on green. It means, "when turning left, but the solid light is green, and the left turn arrow is not lit up, yield to oncoming traffic. But if the solid light is green and the left turn arrow is lit, then do not yield." So you literally do not yield on green.

Sure you can just tell people to "please learn the road signs" no matter how terrible... or we can acknowledge that this is an asinine design. I have no idea why anyone would spend energy defending this.

[–] betamark@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I interpret the sign correctly and would still strongly argue that it is a bad sign. I appreciate what you have added to the conversation!

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago

Its a bad sign. I agree.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)