1328
AI rule (media.infosec.exchange)
submitted 11 months ago by Masimatutu@lemm.ee to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

No.

The subject is intellectual property, in general.

Why am I not entitled to share culture?

Why am I not entitled to create, if similarity exists?

Why does someone get to own an idea, just because they wrote it down first?

[-] femboycuddles@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 months ago

Is the world's copyright system flawed? Yes. Should it be completely removed? No, because otherwise a lot of creative branches would be unsustainable. Artists need money, musicians need money etc.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

I'm not against copyright. I'm trying to guide this other use through why their post is a nonsensical response to someone who is.

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago

If you don't want to defend what you said that's fine but I'm not going to pretend we were actually talking about something else. 🤷‍♂️ "Share culture" is not when you take someone else's drawing and dropship hundreds of shittily made tshirts on the Facebook marketplace. That's what IP protects artists from and fighting stuff like that takes up a stupid amount of time for anyone that isn't a corporation.

If you are creating that's absolutely fine. But shit you typed into AI isn't creating anything and literally couldn't exist without the people that actually create art.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

So you still have no idea what I'm trying to convey here.

You're fixated on one aspect, and ignoring all other consequences. "If you are creating that’s absolutely fine" is NOT what any version of copyright law says. Not ever. So demanding an answer to an explanation of why your first response was a strawman is not the mic-drop you think it is.

Again:

“Artists don’t deserve to profit off their own work” is a position you made up. They're your words. It's a thing you, and you alone, have said. But that's never the same thing as whether anyone else can. This is such a basic 'not-all doesn't mean none' distinction, and it is the only reason I wrote the only words you chose to read.

[-] steakmeout@aussie.zone 1 points 11 months ago

Look at who they responded to. The statement is not a straan when the person that was responded to doesn't believe in respect the rights of creators.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

As if copyright never censors creators.

this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
1328 points (100.0% liked)

196

16251 readers
2871 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS