this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
180 points (94.6% liked)

Games

16714 readers
468 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
180
Starfield Desperately Needs More Unique Locations (www.thegamer.com)
submitted 1 year ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
51 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] li10@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I still don’t really see how you could give the game 10/10, but I think you’re right about that sweet spot.

Would be interesting to see how many 10/10 reviewers would still stand by that rating though.

[–] guylacaptivite@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

They would because they get paid for it. These people aren't journalists, their job is just to write the favorable articles for the people who paid their boss for it. Whoever gives 10/10 to anything should not be taken seriously.