658
submitted 1 year ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lloram239@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think that in it’s core, it’s a fight for freedom.

You must have drunken too much of the Hamas Cool-Aid.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamas_Charter#Analysis

The original, 1988 version of the charter emphasize four main themes: [18]

  • Destroying Israel and establishing an Islamic theocracy in Palestine is essential;[18]
  • Unrestrained jihad is necessary to achieve this;[18]
  • Negotiated resolutions of Jewish and Palestinian claims to the land are unacceptable;[18]
  • Historical anti-semitic tropes that reinforce the goals.[18]

The Covenant proclaims that Israel will exist until Islam obliterates it, and jihad against Jews is required until Judgement Day. Compromise over the land is forbidden. The documents promote holy war as divinely ordained, reject political solutions, and call for instilling these views in children.[18]

[-] supimacat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago

Almost all freedom movements have extremists. The existence of extremists doesn't justify oppressing innocent civilians. Focusing on Hamas is important, sure. But what's a LOT more important is how Israel is (and has been) treating Palestinians. A complete disregard and lack of accountability for Israel's actions while simultaneously asking the oppressed to condemn Hamas sounds a bit too insane to me.

There's a reason why pro-palestine protestors do not talk about Hamas: they don't support Hamas. But talking about Hamas takes the attention away from the crap that Israel has been putting Gaza through for more than a decade. Sure, both need to be heard. But right now, what's not being done (and in fact, actively ignored) is talking about Israel's actions: making it seem like a response to Hamas' recent attacks even though it's been happening for so long.

[-] lloram239@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hamas is not a random group of extremist, Hamas is the government that Gazans voted into power back in 2006.

And as always: If you have a better way to handle this, let us know. Everybody keeps complaining about Israel, ignores all the war crimes Hamas committed and provides no alternatives. Time machines don't exists, so any "but Israel in the past blabla..." is rather useless.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago
  1. Nearly half of all Palestinians in Gaza hadn't even been born then.
[-] supimacat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, it's a religious conflict. There's not going to be any satisfactory solution for both parties really. It's still absolutely horrible that they resort to violence over this, both the israeli government and hamas are to blame for this, and as always, the ones caught in the crossfire are innocent civilians. However, if residents of Gaza were allowed to leave, most would flee anyway, despite it (possibly) being their land. Preventing that is something Israel is certainly to be blamed for. Of course, one can make an argument about terrorists escaping along with them, but yeah.

Also, just because you can't change history doesn't mean that you ignore it, but anyway.

this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
658 points (93.0% liked)

World News

38930 readers
2204 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS