this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
396 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

59223 readers
3330 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Shoulda coulda. Not everyone is a programmer.

[–] Hawk@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago

Except every scientist and analyst. Stats, data sci and ML is done in R and Python, be it astro, health data or genomics.

If someone has been taught stats in spreadsheet software, they have have been taught wrong, period.

Also, programming is a very strong term. we're talking about stats in a scripting language, not software development in CPP.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They should be if they're doing data analysis like this.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it works, it works. Programming is a tough thing to learn.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Programming in R or Python isn't a lot harder than learning how to get Excel to do what you want. I'd wager it's easier since you don't have to fight your tools.

Excel has its place for simple quick calculations. But at some point it's simply the wrong tool.

[–] isles@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Research projects almost exclusively have more than one person working on them.