Technology

59223 readers

3781 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

227

One month after experimental pig heart transplant, doctors say they see no signs of rejection or infection (www.cnn.com)

submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

One month after experimental pig heart transplant, doctors say they see no signs of rejection or infection::One month after an experimental procedure to transplant the heart of a genetically modified pig into a patient with end-stage heart disease, doctors say the heart is functioning on its own and shows no signs of rejection.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kinther@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Cool technology, but kind of fucked up we grow animals with spare parts for us only to take them out and kill them. Once this gets to the point we can grow them in a petri dish the ethical concerns should no longer be an issue.

[–] Nevoic@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you're not a vegan this is a super weird take. Hell, as a vegan myself, I don't have a massive issue with trading pig lives for human lives. Yes it'd be ideal if we did it in other ways, but there's an actually decent argument that it's permissible and even good to save humans by killing animals.

Killing pigs because "mmm bacon" though? Yeah that's a bad reason. Pleasure doesn't permit suffering, most humans understand that unlees it's their own pleasure they're talking about.

[–] kinther@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Given the hivemind that are social media websites and their tendency to lean toward "mmm bacon", you never know who will react when you talk about the ethics behind killing animals. Even planting the seed of considering them not just bio-bags of spare organs could lead someone to question their consumption of meat down the road.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's much less fucked than growing them just for food we don't actually need to eat, just luxury. And we do that on an absurdly large scale.

[–] kinther@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I mean you're not wrong...

[–] funkajunk@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What if the rest of the animal is used as food?

[–] CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think their point of view was as if we were judged by an intelligent alien species, where we would have to admit yeah it does look fucked

[–] funkajunk@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Intelligent ≠ vegan

[–] Orionza@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Ew that's kind of messed up, isn't it?