this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
997 points (93.7% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
3 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
997
Well, this is something! (files.mastodon.social)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Masimatutu@lemm.ee to c/europe@feddit.de
 

Meanwhile in Germany:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Sigmatics@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm saying the south would need at least 5x (you can fight me on the exact number) the turbines of the North to get to 100%.

This is due to

  • higher energy consumption due to energy intensive industry
  • lower wind turbine output due to less wind

Therefore it's not worth it to build a ton of turbines in the south. Sure, we could have more in those locations where it's worth it (dark spots on the map).

I grew up in a village near the Alps, one of the few with it's own citizen-financed wind turbine. My parents invested. They're lucky to get their money back because the return is so bad. Once the state money ran out it barely paid for itself