this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
1677 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59596 readers
3014 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can confirm. In 2023 despite having LED lightbulbs - we consume 7 more watts per hour per lightbulb than the average lightbulb did in 1546.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The lights back then probably weren't very bright were they?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But they used very little electricity, almost none

[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They also did jack shit for illumination, so...

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The average light bulbs in 1546 definitely did jack shit that's for sure.

[–] s_i_m_s@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah considering they didn't discover electricity until the 1700s then they didn't even invent one that lasted long enough to be practical until 1879.

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's the joke isn't it? Just for historical context Michaelangelo completed the Last Judgement on the Sistine chapel in 1541, so like 5 years before 1546, and I don't think he had flashlights to help him with the lighting.