179

Gazans break into aid centres, taking flour and supplies, UN says (www.reuters.com)

submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Thousands of Gaza residents broke into warehouses and distribution centres of the United Nations Palestinian refugee agency (UNRWA) grabbing flour and "basic survival items", the organisation said on Sunday.

"This is a worrying sign that civil order is starting to break down after three weeks of war and a tight siege on Gaza," the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) said in a statement.

One of the warehouses, located in Deir al-Balah, is where UNRWA stores supplies from the humanitarian convoys crossing into Gaza from Egypt.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] tpihkal@lemmy.world -29 points 1 year ago

And yet those neighbors allow the very people that want total social collapse to build tunnels under their homes and businesses and establish bases and torture chambers in their hospitals.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 20 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, because your average Gazan could totally stand up to the armed militia that's in charge of every aspect of life in the strip.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nice Spin, I must have missed the news reports of the total water, food, energy, and medical embargo the Palestinians were inflicting on the Israeli people.

[+] tpihkal@lemmy.world -8 points 1 year ago

Hamas destroyed their infrastructure to build rockets. Literally tore up pipes that were used to supply water to build rockets. The Palestinians are suffering as a direct result of Hamas.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 20 points 1 year ago

Quite right, the citizens of Gaza have two oppressors right now, Hamas and the IDF... saying the children (50% of Gaza <18) deserve to starve because of guilt by association is also evil.

Collective punishment invites collective reprisals.... magnifies violence. If your ever on the side of killing children your on the wrong side. Which means... there are more then two sides here.

[-] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Okay buddy I’m sure you’d have acted differently when the alternative is getting shot, and you can’t really argue that they’re worse than the israeli government treats you.

[-] sfgifz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People were all too happy to give the Russian people a pass when they invaded Ukraine. It wasn't "Russians" who were killing Ukrainians, it was "Putins Russia" that was responsible for this "Putins Invasion". The same kind of narrative is never extended when the parties involved aren't white.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago

There are a good number of logically consistent people out there who defend the Palestinians. I've only been seeing this number increase lately. This is happening despite the media not being logically consistent and pretty much unequivocally supporting the Zionists in Israel.

[-] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

How does this argument ever make sense to you? Do you truly consider people to be one monolithic group with no dissenting opinions? The exact same comparison was made, just as now people are saying it’s the Israeli prime ministers actions, which is actually very fair given the amount of israeli citizens showing very natural disdain for the genocide.

[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Did you just try excuse a war crime with "it could be worse"?

this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023

179 points (95.9% liked)

World News

38977 readers

2076 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.