this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
230 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

59404 readers
3197 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
230
US to build new nuclear gravity bomb (www.defensenews.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
69 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

US to build new nuclear gravity bomb::Experts say this new higher-yield nuclear bomb appears intended to pave the way for retiring the older B83 megaton bomb.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Right. The ~3k nukes the US has are too expensive to maintain, let's make more.

Sounds like the US.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

If the maintenance and production of new ones is cheaper than maintaining the old ones, it makes sense to replace them. But then they’d have to actually replace/decommission the old ones.

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

Do you think it's cheaper to maintain stuff from 40 years ago, or to make something new?

Keep in mind you can't exactly go down to the nearest AutoZone to buy replacement parts either.