this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
424 points (100.0% liked)

Bad Women's Anatomy

804 readers
1 users here now

A subreddit for discussions about how certain people just don't understand how women's bodies work.

Rules:

  1. No brigading.
  2. Please be sure that you have the anatomy right.
  3. You don't have to be polite but you do have to conduct yourself like a responsible adult.
  4. Respect your fellow human.
  5. ~~Please select the appropriate flair for your post.~~ (Flair does not exist on lemmy... yet? hopefully?)
  6. ~~Please check the List of Common Reposts~~. (Doesn't exist on lemmy yet)
  7. Fetish art and low effort posts: see wiki
  8. No medical advice.
  9. ~~Photoshop Phriday: see wiki~~ (Suspended until migration is over)
  10. No trolling.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] onion@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can somebody explain the re-Xed X?

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 56 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The straightest Peter (parker) got the manliest MJ (Mary Jane), sadge (twitch emote for sad/cringe). It's a chud being a chud about Mary Jane not being fuckable enough for their tastes in a spiderman game, because that's an opinion people have now I guess

[–] Remmock@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To he fair regarding the facts, MJ is supposed to be far more attractive than a “normal” woman and way out of Peter’s league. She fixes his fashion and gets him to ditch the glasses.

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Idk, after a quick google I think this portrayal of MJ is faithful. Perhaps that's just me/my tastes. She's well above average. I think you'd be hard pressed to find anyone that could honestly say that she's average/below average.

Within the confines of comic books and adjacent media, perhaps she's not as attractive as originally intended due to the hypersexualization of people in this genre. That's more of a comment on the social conditions that lead to this trope rather than if she's fuckable or not though

[–] Remmock@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Eh, fair shakes.

[–] John_Coomsumer@beehaw.org 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There like 56 versions of MJ and some have wildly different character traits, visual features, and relationships with Peter, to claim that MJ is "supposed to be" anything just betrays ignorance of the franchise

[–] Remmock@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fact that you dismiss that there is a baseline MJ on which all subsequent MJs are based on to at least some extent but generally have the character wholly intact betrays your ignorance of not only the franchise but of the comic book industry in general.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The baseline is literally "attractive redhead" and that's it.

[–] Remmock@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It’s a shame that that’s all you reduce her to.

[–] instamat@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you explain the straightest Peter part too?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago

I can't.

I guess I missed the part in Spider-Man Homecoming, where Peter and Ned cupped each others balls...

[–] objectionist@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

you mean the retweeted tweet? because why the fuck would you show a corporation manners

[–] Nepenthe@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

I'm enjoying that their question really was gibberish to me before you put it in normal terms. May it always remain that way