561
submitted 1 year ago by woshang@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A year after he bought Twitter for $44 billion, Musk thinks the company is now worth $19 billion, a 55 percent drop.

Let's recap what he did to Twitter, I will go first:

  • Changed the original name Twitter to X.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world 87 points 1 year ago

Is anyone else surprised it's even worth that much?

[-] yata@sh.itjust.works 69 points 1 year ago

A lot of journalists, politicians and influencers are really reluctant to let it go. I guess those are the ones still keeping it somewhat afloat.

It should be more publicly shamed if you keep being a part of his insanity.

[-] Fisk400@feddit.nu -3 points 1 year ago

It's because no other social media platform currently meets their requirements. Other platforms either functions significantly different from twitter or it lacks the reach that a politician needs in order for it to be worth their time.

[-] eddietrax@dmv.social 21 points 1 year ago

“Worth their time” ? Copy\paste the text into Mastodon. Post Done

I can empathize with the reluctance to completely jump ship but it costs nothing (both money and time) to cross post to another platform.

[-] Fisk400@feddit.nu 3 points 1 year ago

Last time I was on mastodon during one of the many twitter migrations there was a long post saying that people should hold of on auto-blocking people that don't caption the images they post because new user haven't learned the cultural rules of mastodon. Is that a thing? I don't know, could be a particular part of mastodon, I don't know. Point is that serious public figures have been trained to be careful when adopting new social media.

[-] IdealShrew@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

yeah but nobody uses mastodon

[-] eddietrax@dmv.social 7 points 1 year ago

Hi. Nobody here 👋 I enjoy Mastodon and although nowhere near the same engagement as Shitter, I enjoy the content more. Some people like different things

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yep. I mean in the end it has no product. It's just billboard/ad space, in the world of commerce. Sure, it's a lot of ad space, but ad space in the digital world is also effectively endless, so the percentage still isn't actually that relevant as it can shift in a moment's notice.

Say... if a neonazi buys the platform and brings all his friends with him.

But beyond an office he's not even paying for and so on, Xitter got... nothing. They have no actual product that can be liquidated, no supply chains worth any money, nothing to rent/sell out beyond said adspace. Like many digital companies they rely entirely on hype for all their perceived value.

[-] donuts@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Honestly it's probably not... Estimates aside, who would even want to buy Twitter in its current incarnation?

[-] Fisk400@feddit.nu 11 points 1 year ago

It still has a big enough user base and brand recognition that they could put things back on course if they really went for it. The only permanent damage is the brain drain from firing a lot of people that has experience in running twitter.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

The only permanent damage is the brain drain from firing a lot of people that has experience in running twitter.

That's like saying "he suffered no permanent damage except the removal of his spine"

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Brand recognition? That's ironic. The Twitter brand had recognition. But you can't say X, you have to say "X, formerly Twitter."

Otherwise you're right, of course, But I can't see it being resurrected.

[-] Fisk400@feddit.nu 8 points 1 year ago

Yes, twitter is the brand. The first action of a sane buyer would be to put the bird logo back. 20 billions of its current value comes from the fact that they still own that name.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

It was never actually worth what musk paid, but I get that you're saying the name was half the value. Looks like musk agrees.

[-] donuts@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't know about the active userbase so who knows. Personally I don't think the Twitter brand is as strong as it was a year and change ago.

Even without the change to X, is there anyone who feels that Twitter is anything more than a shell of its former self? It's not as simple as just bringing back the bird, in my opinion.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure it’s worth fuck all.

this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
561 points (96.1% liked)

News

23305 readers
3694 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS