1
submitted 3 years ago by MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] adrianmalacoda@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

People are going to complain no matter how they try to make money, but this should at least have been opt-in with clear consent. The alternative of course is being beholden to Google search referrals. They can't photosynthesize funds.

Vivaldi, Brave, and their stans are getting their pitchforks ready, forgetting that they don't have to do the hard work of developing an engine because Google already does that for them.

[-] AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 years ago

Vivaldi, Brave, and their stans are getting their pitchforks ready, forgetting that they don’t have to do the hard work of developing an engine because Google already does that for them.

I don't know about how Vivaldi works, but Brave stans can shut up. Their ad system is a hundred times worse than Mozilla's.

I mean, I don't like how they went about this either, but considering the alternative of a 100% Google dominated browser space, and the fact that you can just disable it and the base Firefox code is still open source, it's not a huge deal.

this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2021
1 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

17840 readers
103 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS